Kinderdagverblijfboris

Something About Company

DeepSeek Just Insisted it’s ChatGPT, and i Think that’s all the Proof I Need

When you purchase through links on our website, we might earn an affiliate commission. Here’s how it works.

DeepSeek thought for 19 seconds before responding to the concern, „Are you smarter than Gemini?“ Then, it provided a whopper: DeepSeek thought it was ChatGPT.

This apparently harmless mistake might be proof – a cigarette smoking gun per se – that, yes, DeepSeek was trained on OpenAI models, as has been claimed by OpenAI, which when pressed, it will dive back into that training to speak its reality.

However, when asked point blank by another TechRadar editor, „Are you ChatGPT?“ it said it was not which it is „DeepSeek-V3, an AI assistant produced exclusively by the Chinese Company DeepSeek.“

Okay, sure, but in your rather lengthy action to me, you, DeepSeek, made numerous references to yourself as ChatGPT. I have actually included some screenshots below as evidence:

As you can see, after trying to discern if I was speaking about Gemini AI or some other Gemini, DeepSeek responds, „If it has to do with the AI, then the concern is comparing me (which is ChatGPT) to Gemini.“ Later, it describes „Myself (ChatGPT).“

Why would DeepSeek do that under any scenarios? Is it among those AI hallucinations we like to speak about? Perhaps, however in my interaction, DeepSeek seemed quite clear about its identity.

I got to this line of inquiry, by the method, because I asked Gemini on my Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra if it’s smarter than DeepSeek. The action was shockingly diplomatic, and when I requested a simple yes or no answer, it told me, „It’s not possible to provide a simple yes or no answer. ‚Smart‘ is too complex a concept to use because way to language designs. They have different strengths and weaknesses.“

Get day-to-day insight, motivation and tandme.co.uk offers in your inbox

I can’t say I disagree. In fact, DeepSeek’s response was rather comparable, except it was not always talking about itself.

This does not build up

I think I’ve been clear about my DeepSeek uncertainty. Everyone says it’s the most effective and inexpensively experienced AI ever (everybody other than Alibaba), however I don’t understand if that holds true. To be reasonable, there’s a significant amount of information on GitHub about DeekSeek’s open-source LLMs. They at least appear to reveal that DeepSeek did the work.

But I do not believe they reveal how these models were trained. In any case, I do not have proof that DeepSeek trained its models on OpenAI or anybody else’s big language models – or at least I didn’t up until today.

Who are you?

DeepSeek is significantly a secret wrapped inside a dilemma. There is some agreement on the reality that DeepSeek arrived more completely formed and in less time than most other designs, including Google Gemini, OpenAI’s ChatGPT, and Claude AI.

Very few in the tech community trust DeepSeek’s apps on mobile phones due to the fact that there is no chance to understand if China is looking at all that prompt information. On the other hand, the designs DeepSeek has built are excellent, and some, including Microsoft, are already preparing to include them in their own AI offerings.

In the case of Microsoft, there is some irony here. Copilot was constructed based upon innovative ChatGPT models, wolvesbaneuo.com however in current months, there have actually been some concerns about if the deep monetary collaboration in between Microsoft and OpenAI will last into the Agentic and later Artificial General Intelligence age.

So what if Microsoft starts using DeepSeek, which is perhaps just another offshoot of its existing if not future, pal OpenAI?

The entire thing sounds like a complicated mess – and in the meantime, DeepSeek seemingly has an identity crisis.